Cerca Articolo

Share |

Rethinking Grammar - Who makes the rules?

Gennaio 2016
Vi siete mai chiesti da dove vengono le regole di grammatica che si studiano a scuola? E se anziché di linguistica fosse solo una questione di potere? Continuate a leggere. Ne scoprirete delle belle.

di Adam Brock | VOICE OF AMERICA

Video:

Bob Dylan
Bob Dylan

When you learned Italian grammar in school, you were taught to think about “correct” and “incorrect” ways of using a language. Maybe you had to “unlearn” some grammar patterns that you heard at home because your teacher said they were wrong.
The traditional way of teaching grammar in school is called prescriptive grammar. Grammar is seen as a set of rules to follow. The rules are passed from one generation to another. Those who do not follow the rules are looked down upon as being careless or poorly educated.

Descriptive Grammar

Descriptive grammar takes a different approach. Descriptive grammarians observe and analyze language as it is used in different communities. They look for rules and patterns that people follow. In descriptive grammar, there is no correct or incorrect way of using grammar.

in english...

For example, a prescriptive grammarian might say, “Don’t use a double negative because it is illogical.” A descriptive grammarian might say, “Some communities use double negatives and some do not. Why is that?” We’ll talk more about double negatives later.
Dr. Richard Epstein is a linguist at Rutgers University in New Jersey. Dr. Epstein says that most people do not understand the social and political processes behind grammar rules.
“Nobody knows why we should not use ‘ain’t’ or why we should not use double negatives because the teachers teach these things as if they were simply rules that came down from some higher power, authority, maybe God.”

THE CASE OF THE DOUBLE NEGATIVE

Dr. Epstein says grammar rules have nothing to do with logic. Instead, they are based on social fashions, politics, and power. He gives the example of the double negative.
Certain types of double negative words are not allowed in English. For example, “I don’t know nothing.” The two words “don’t” and “nothing” are both negative. In mathematics, two negatives equal a positive. But is this true in language? Does “I don’t know nothing” mean “I know something”? Of course not. It just makes a stronger negative. The rule against the double negative does not come from mathematics; it comes from Robert Lowth, the bishop of London! 

THE BISHOP?!

Robert Lowth’s book A Short Introduction to English Grammar, first published in 1762, prohibited the double negative. Dr. Epstein says that random grammar rules were a way for the upper classes of London to protect themselves from a rising middle class.
“The upper classes became concerned that people below them were getting educated and getting access to sources of power. So to protect their own status and authority people  started to prescribe rules for grammar. And if you couldn’t follow those rules then you didn’t have access to power and authority like the rich people of the day.”

the american Ain’T

Here’s another example. American children are taught that “ain’t” is not a word. However, many Americans say “ain’t” in place of “is not” or “are not.”  
Listen to this song by Bob Dylan:

Someone to open each and every door
But it ain’t me, babe
No, no, no it ain’t me, babe
It ain’t me you’re looking for, babe


American school teachers told children to stop using the word “ain’t” in the 1800s. But long ago, the word “ain’t” was the proper negative contraction for “I am not.” Ironically, the British upper classes continued to use “ain’t” after the Americans banned it. Dr. Epstein explains: “Knowing that regular people used ‘ain’t’ but the upper classes of the United States didn’t, they created this sort of fake rule that you shouldn’t use ‘ain’t’ because it didn’t make sense. Of course it makes perfect sense to anybody who says it. But now we have this rule.”
So who makes the grammar rules? In America, the grammar patterns of rich white men are the basis of Standard American English, Epstein says. Nobody will go to jail for ignoring grammar rules. But they will have difficulty getting into the best schools and finding good jobs.


Torna all'inizio
submitting your vote...
Hai già votato per questo articolo
4
average

90854c678fdafef96bd1a3ab09bf2d2857c8addf